商业研究分配领导管理

加拿大Assignment代写范文:“商业研究分配领导管理”，这篇论文主要描述的是管理是一个企业经营中最为重要的一部分，本文以金宝汤和桂格燕麦这两间著名的食品制造商为例，它们都在食品制造领域取得不错的成功，但是他们却有着两种迥然不同的管理方式，金宝汤的管理主要以民主作为出发点，鼓励员工参与到的企业管理的决策当中，与之相反，桂格燕麦则是以独裁的管理方式来下分任务，两种领导管理的方式各有各的优缺点。

Management is a very important part of a business and most of the times it is difficult to define exactly what is meant by ‘management. According to the essay, we know that the Campbell Soup and Quaker Oats companies are two of the largest and best known food manufacturers. They all achieve a big success, but they have two different way to go. Largely, analysts believed because of differences in the way the companies were managed and the characteristics of the people who managed them. Campbell Soup’s manager is David W.Johnson and the Quaker Oats’s CEO is William D.Smithbury. David W.Johnson is an easygoing, approachable people and he gets along well with his employees. But William D.Smithbury has to fire if he can not do business well, so he does not have a peaceful heart to do this.

On the other hand, the management style of Campbell Soup is democratic. It is a kind of leadership style which encourages participation in a decision making. This management style boosts motivation and welcomes involvement, workers feel the ownership of the firm and its ideas, and improve sharing of ideas and experiences within the business, and it also can delay decision making. Also, in this stale, the leader is very esteem his employees and give them some rights to take part in actives of firm. And also this leadership style can be persuasive and consultative. Persuasive manager convince others to agree with him, while consultative manager asks others’ idea before coming up with a decision. From the essay, these are what the CEO of Campbell Soup David W.Johnson. He is very approachable and he cares about his employees. He delegates authority and protect the employees’ right, so it can increase employees’ motivation. Which made me think that most of his success the company’s success can be rooted a good management style, so employees can work seriously. Because he thinks the changes in sales and profits reflect how well the managers are doing. Which make me think that most of his success are he gets along well with his employees and he uses a good management style to control his business.

In contrast, the management style of Quaker Oats is autocratic. It is a style of leadership where the management sets objectives, allocates tasks, and insists on obedience. It sometimes makes the members of the group become more dependent on him/her. However, members are most of the times

dissatisfied with this leadership style. The cohesion between the leaders and employees is just little, and a lead to a high level of supervision and poor level of motivation. From the essay, William D.Smithbury who is Quaker Oats’s CEO just makes decisions by himself, he is very confident and he never thinks to discuss with employees, it tends to that he does not know what do employees need or want, this could make the motivation decrease. He just focus on how to achieve his job and ignore the quality of his business. When he decides to buy Snapple, he has much confident, other people think it is only need $700 million, but he pays $1.7 billion for Snapple. In fact, when he becomes failure, he blames his top executive and assumes their responsible, make Quaker Oats managers totally demoralized. This could lead to motivation decrease a lot too. In the end it leads to his unsuccessful business.

Autocratic and democratic are quite different management styles. Autocratic is when the work force is told what to do. While democratic is when they will be able to discuss it. These two different management styles have different advantages and disadvantages. Autocratic do not have to spend on many time making decisions, but it has high risks and low motivation. On the other hand, democratic has high motivation of staff and increase efficiency and speed up production and it also has better quality, but it may cause the conflict and it sometimes has low decisions. You use autocratic or democratic depending on their business types.

Also, their management styles have some relationships with motivation theory. David W.Johnson uses Maslow’s theory and Y theory, he get along well with his employees and makes the bonuses link to company’s performance. This is Taylor’s Scientific Management. Taylor has a very simple view of motivated people at work-money, by this way could easier to increase worker’s motivation. On the other hand William D.Smithbury uses Herzberg’s two-factor and theory Y. When he buy the Snapple, he does not listen to others’ opinions and when he failed, he blamed his top managers to assumed their responsibilities.

In conclusion, the biggest difference between Campbell Soup and Quaker Oats is how their managers treat their employees, and this could affect the motivation of their workers. David W.Johnson use democratic management style to manage his company, he sets goals for achieve the vision and he gives his employees many rights to help him do some business and make decisions. It makes them have more motivation and leads to his business success. In contrast, William D.Smithbury use autocratic style to manage his workers, he always makes the big decisions and lets his managers implement without reference to anyone else. The most important thing is that he never thinks about his workers, and never protects them. This lead to the decrease of motivation, and then they choose strike, final it leads to business fail.

51due留学教育原创版权郑重声明：原创留学生作业代写范文源自编辑创作，未经官方许可，网站谢绝转载。对于侵权行为，未经同意的情况下，51Due有权追究法律责任。

51due为留学生提供最好的加拿大Assignment代写服务，亲们可以进入主页了解和获取更多assignment代写范文 提供加拿大econ辅导服务，详情可以咨询我们的客服QQ:800020041哟。-xz